Families' Heartache Regarding Coastal Degradation Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.
Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.